Pentad archetypes
Source path: knowledge-base/knowledge/conventions/narrative/04-narrative-archetypes.md
# Pentad archetypes An archetype names the **composition of a whole Domain**. It is not the Sign of one Scene and it is not the grade. The grade says how fully the record realises all five forces; the archetype says exactly which forces have formed strongly enough to carry the work. The old names—Paper, Chronicle, Opus—worked because they felt like made things a reader could recognise, possess, and compare. The pentad keeps that commodity quality while making the split complete. Each force is formed at `17/20`, so five binary readings produce `2^5 = Σ C(5,k) = 32` profiles. There is no ascendant, companion gap, or tie-break: every combination has one explicit name. ## One coordinate, two interpretations Archetypes and the pre-existing 32 Scene Signs share the persisted bit order `Fate · World · System · Theme · Causality`, but read it at different altitudes: | Reading | `H` means | Question answered | |---|---|---| | Scene Sign | high in that normalised Scene: nearest polarity for Fate/World/System; `≥ 0.25` for Theme/Causality | What kind of movement is happening now? | | Domain archetype | at least `17/20` in the force grade | What kind of work has this record become? | The Sign names an event or phase—*Apotheosis*, *Aftermath*, *Lore*. The archetype names a work-form— *Opus*, *Loom*, *Paper*. Names never overlap between the two vocabularies, so a reader can tell which altitude is speaking even when the five-bit coordinate is hidden. The five semantic dimensions remain **Vessel** (World/embodiment), **Codex** (System/constraint), **Loom** (Causality/connection), **Compass** (Fate/possibility), and **Mirror** (Theme/recurrence). They explain the forces; the 32 names below classify the resulting works. ## Sixteen contrary pairs Flipping every `H` to `L` and every `L` to `H` gives a profile's **counterform**. This is a semantic contrary, not a good/bad axis: it asks what the work would resemble if every formed force were latent and every latent force formed. The same operation also pairs the existing Scene Signs. | Profile | Work form · Scene Sign | Counter-profile | Counterform · Scene Sign | |---|---|---|---| | `HLLLL` | **Compass** · Closure | `LHHHH` | **Cosmology** · Genesis | | `HHLLL` | **Quest** · Climax | `LLHHH` | **Scripture** · Canon | | `HLHLL` | **Gambit** · Revelation | `LHLHH` | **Ballad** · Ascent | | `HLLLH` | **Prognosis** · Sentence | `LHHHL` | **Mythos** · Wonder | | `HLLHL` | **Vision** · Elegy | `LHHLH` | **Clockwork** · Founding | | `HHHLL` | **Adventure** · Epoch | `LLLHH` | **Parable** · Vigil | | `HHLLH` | **Drama** · Verdict | `LLHHL` | **Charter** · Doctrine | | `HHLHL` | **Saga** · Crescendo | `LLHLH` | **Treatise** · Edict | | `HLHLH` | **Forecast** · Decree | `LHLHL` | **Portrait** · Flourish | | `HLHHL` | **Testament** · Prophecy | `LHLLH` | **Chronicle** · Harvest | | `HLLHH` | **Augury** · Requiem | `LHHLL` | **Atlas** · Discovery | | `HLHHH` | **Sutra** · Oracle | `LHLLL` | **Vessel** · Growth | | `HHLHH` | **Romance** · Catharsis | `LLHLL` | **Paper** · Lore | | `HHHLH` | **Dossier** · Reckoning | `LLLHL` | **Mirror** · Reverie | | `HHHHL` | **Myth** · Legend | `LLLLH` | **Loom** · Aftermath | | `HHHHH` | **Opus** · Apotheosis | `LLLLL` | **Fragment** · Rest | The pair is an adversarial naming check. *Opus/Fragment* makes completeness legible. *Romance/Paper* contrasts embodied possibility and meaning with an abstract system. *Myth/Loom* contrasts an implicit causal chain with causality standing alone. A pair that cannot explain its reversal has not earned its names. ## Reading the result The number of formed forces is descriptive, not a prestige ladder. A focused Paper can be excellent at what it is; an Opus merely says that all five shares cleared the formation threshold. Read the overall grade and five force shares for realisation, the archetype for composition, the counterform for contrast, and the Scene Sign chain for cadence. The icon follows the same separation. A Scene Sign is a filled five-facet moment. A Domain archetype is an outlined pentagon whose formed semantic nodes are lit; any coupling chords are fitted from that record, not prescribed by the pentad. The shared geometry makes the distinction visible without pretending that scene intensity and whole-work formation are the same measure.Open on GitHub
Raw Markdown source