Anti-personas — who Meridians is not for
Source path: knowledge-base/personas/anti-personas.md
# Anti-personas — who Meridians is not for > Meridians is a causal simulator, not an oracle, diagnosis service, passive streaming catalogue, or > one-off answer box. These are fit boundaries, not insults. ## The fit test they fail The fit requires a consequential situation, causal thinking, authorship of the move, and a return to ask **“what did I cause?”** A person can be curious about the premise and still fail the test. ## Oracle-seeker **Wants:** a prediction, certainty, or verdict. Meridians prices pathways in a declared world. It never predicts the actual future and never chooses a commitment for the person. A forecast product or ordinary advice may serve this person better. ## Self-diagnoser **Wants:** a clinical reading or a definitive account of who they are. Latent-trait readings are unbuilt. If they are built, they must be private, non-clinical, non-diagnostic, and never verdicts. The current product can show what a move caused; it cannot certify a person. ## Passive viewer **Wants:** a story without deciding. A book already serves this need. Prepared Experiences are visual novels, but their reason to exist is that a reader can commit, meet consequence, and return. Watching without choosing is not the causal loop. ## Answer-seeker **Wants:** one answer to one question and no return. Search, chat, or a consultant may be cheaper. Meridians carries state and branch history; that is overhead when there is no situation to keep or experiment to retry. ## Completionist **Wants:** every branch, badge, scene, or collectible. Coverage is not causality. A completionist can consume content while never owning a move or asking what it changed. Do not optimise the product for exhaustive route collection. ## Engagement-seeker **Wants:** more play, regardless of whether the play changes understanding. If play rises while returns to **“what did I cause?”** stay flat, the causal loop is broken. Retention without attributable consequence is not evidence that the simulator works. ## Response Decline to over-promise. Ask for the situation, its actors, incentives, information, constraints, and candidate moves. If those are absent, do not manufacture them merely to keep someone in the funnel.Open on GitHub
Raw Markdown source