What we don't do
Source path: knowledge-base/knowledge/product/strategy/08-what-we-don-t-do.md
# What we don't do - **No world without a reading.** A training world that cannot read the player's run back is content, not training; a fork whose branches differ only in prose is not offered ([spec](../../../specs/training-worlds/README.md)). - **No live gauge, no grade.** The reading is given back afterwards, in the world's words, and never becomes a verdict on the person. - **No claim ahead of the rung.** *Built to change* → *measured to change in these worlds* → *shown to change*; copy stops where the evidence stops ([12](12-the-practice-monopoly.md#the-proof-programme)). - **No second instrument turned on the player.** The Entity Interpretation Graph explains characters; the Rasch record reads the player; neither is clinical and nothing about a person leaves the person ([latent model §10b](../../../specs/latent-model/README.md#10b-the-players-record-is-a-different-instrument-under-the-same-boundary)). - **No cosmetic consequence.** A choice that changes nothing the world will later show is not a fork. - **No passive tracking.** A journey knows what the person chose to tell it and did inside the fiction; nothing more, ever, by implication.Open on GitHub
Raw Markdown source