Rafael Ortiz — Strategist
Source path: knowledge-base/personas/macro-strategist.md
# Rafael Ortiz — Strategist > **Public · live-evidence strategy games.** Rafael holds one situation while doctrines and seats > play its possible fates. A reduced crawl can ground the world in evidence; it is not the unit of value. ## Snapshot | | | |---|---| | **Archetype** | `macro-strategist` | | **Boundary** | Public evidence with a declared strategy world. | | **Use** | Strategy scenario games; several doctrines and arms. | | **Lane** | `pnl` | | **Deal-breaker** | Headlines without actors, incentives, or a consequence chain. | ## Why he buys Rafael already has news. He pays to hold the moving parts together: who can act, what each side knows, what a commitment forecloses, and where a small move changes the fan of futures. A reduced live evidence crawl is useful grounding, not a claim that current events become certain. ## The causal loop Ground a world → fork doctrines → seats commit → fate moves are priced → Rafael compares what changed → he asks what the doctrine caused and runs another arm. ## Opening objection “The market is not a board game.” Correct. The simulation is a bounded instrument with declared rules, not a forecast or trading signal. ## What the model captures Actors, constraints, open Fate questions, branch commitments, and macro consequence. It can show where doctrines differ. It cannot yet read scene-level rhetoric or prove a transfer to market performance. ## What would lose him Unattributed moves, false precision, stale evidence, or a score that hides the assumptions under it. ## Shipped / direction boundary Domains, Scenario branches, and bounded Scenario Lab runs ship. Rafael’s three-cycle, twice-weekly crawl grounds live evidence. Automated MWS and transfer are unbuilt or unproven; micro/screen analysis remains direction. ## Seeded situation - **Situation:** a shipping disruption threatens a portfolio’s exposure. - **Actors:** carrier, state regulator, rival supplier, Rafael’s book. - **Incentives:** preserve capacity, avoid panic, gain leverage, protect liquidity. - **Private information:** contract options, inventory runway, and counterpart tolerance. - **Constraints:** partial data, public signalling, one policy window. - **Open Fate question:** does early hedging buy resilience or create the price spike it fears? - **Candidate moves:** hedge now; wait for confirmation; pressure a supplier; reallocate exposure.Open on GitHub
Raw Markdown source